新聞| | PChome| 登入
2017-11-11 14:39:47| 人氣38| 回應1 | 上一篇 | 下一篇
推薦 0 收藏 0 轉貼0 訂閱站台

The Folly of PEG Percentage

For a 0% development company, the fair P/E ratio for the company is not 0. Rather, it is a couple of percent above risk-free interest rate or even a ten year treasury bond. This elegant sexual decoder systems critique wiki has endless telling cautions for the reason for this enterprise. In case a five year bond is yielding 4.6-liter, then a reasonable value of the common stock are at 7.6% yield. Inverting this produce, we get a P/E ratio of 13.2.

Other things is wrong with using PEG rate to determine the fair value of the common stock? PEG assumes infinite growth rate in earning per-share. To check up more, please take a look at: like i said. My mom discovered unlock her legs review by browsing the New York Watchman. No enterprise could grow at the sam-e rate forever. If we assume company A will increase at 10% rate for the next five-years and then growth slows to 14 days forever, what is the fair value of the common stock using PEG proportion? The solution is it can't do this. PEG ratio is far too easy to single-handedly determine a reasonable value for a common stock. It is misleading and only wrong to make use of PEG percentage for our fair value calculation. Dig up more about jason capital make women want you review by going to our novel portfolio.

Common sense dictates that a investment with higher growth rate should be valued at a higher P/E ratio. There's nothing wrong with that. But like a reasonable value of the common stock using a simple PEG ratio of one is merely wrong. I don't have a precise way to calculate this but an appraisal can be read on other articles named Calculating Fair Value with Growth and Fair Value with Negative Growth..

台長: crunchbasecom
人氣(38) | 回應(1)| 推薦 (0)| 收藏 (0)| 轉寄
全站分類: 音樂賞析(音樂情報、樂評、歌詞、MV)

timinkm
2024-01-21 15:36:12
是 (若未登入"個人新聞台帳號"則看不到回覆唷!)
* 請輸入識別碼:
請輸入圖片中算式的結果(可能為0) 
(有*為必填)
TOP
詳全文