認真做專利 希望所有的專利工程師 都能認真做專利

21愛的鼓勵 0訂閱站台

以下附上MPEP的規定

例外的情況就是" "的部份

也就是

不知道的不必寫

大家都知道的也不必寫

其實在專利的領域

有一件違反一般人經驗法則的事情

就是有時候越難的地方越沒有價值

因為難所以有做論文的價值

所以就吸引學術界一些人去研究

然後提出解決的辦法

然後企業就跟著用

因為困難所以就很難再提出新的解決辦法

所以企業的發明就只能解決比較枝微末節的地方

在說明時讓人聽不懂的都是那些困難卻對可專利性沒幫助的地方

 

以下請參考MPEP的規定

2165 The Best Mode Requirement

Determining compliance with the best mode requirement requires a two-prong inquiry. First, it must be determined whether, at the time the application was filed, the inventor possessed a best mode for practicing the invention. This is a subjective inquiry which focuses on the inventor's state of mind at the time of filing. Second, if the inventor did possess a best mode, it must be determined whether the written description disclosed the best mode such that a person skilled in the art could practice it. This is an objective inquiry, focusing on the scope of the claimed invention and the level of skill in the art. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Barr Laboratories Inc., 251 F.3d 955, 963, 58 USPQ2d 1865, 1874 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

"The failure to disclose a better method will not invalidate a patent if the inventor, at the time of filing the application, did not know of the better method OR did not appreciate that it was the best method."

2164.08 Enablement Commensurate in Scope With the Claims

The Federal Circuit has repeatedly held that "the specification must teach those skilled in the art how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without 'undue experimentation'." In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1561, 27 USPQ2d 1510, 1513 (Fed. Cir. 1993). "Nevertheless, not everything necessary to practice the invention need be disclosed. In fact, what is well-known is best omitted. In re Buchner, 929 F.2d 660, 661, 18 USPQ2d 1331, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 1991)."