夢判蔣介石 廖清秀 每週一問題 馬英九解答 答案要公開 答錯要扣分

7愛的鼓勵 0訂閱站台

86X2195,開刀後身體較為虛弱常常唸佛經，尤其是：《佛說阿彌陀經》。無辜被害人民冤魂不散，換成是你被害，你會甘心瞑目嗎？請跟隨：今天的日程安排〈E2〉

86X2195, relatively weak health after surgery / traitor and a traitor to Taiwan lackeys who have sincere repentance; often Buddhist sutras, in particular: "Buddha Amitabha Sutra." Innocent people killed innocent people to leave, and replaced you killed, you will be willing to rest in peace it? Please follow: Today's schedule <E2>

主旨：4點關於總統的最高法院提名：
主旨：你需要知道的關於最高法院提名人是什麼：

 

所有時間均為美國東部時間（ET）

10:00：總統和副總統接受了總統每日簡報

下午12:15：總統在首席法官加蘭德的確認過程中的一次電話會議參與

 

 

 

 

※對不起！我開刀後身體較為虛弱，我的希望、期盼、看法、觀點、理念，以及到網友處PO文…等等暫時停止一段時間。

※I am sorry! I cut the body more frail, I hope, expectations, opinions, views, ideas, as well as to users of the PO text ... and so temporarily stop for some time.

 

給中國民進黨那麼多的“立法委員”又有何用？還是讓馬英九出國丟臉矮化臺灣，而立法委員們卻只會坐議立談上節目之外，似乎拿不出對策來…唉！果然如我所預料一般，不幸被我猜中。

To China so many DPP "legislators" what is the use? Let shame dwarfing Taiwan Ma Ying-jeou abroad, while lawmakers proposed legislation but would sit outside to talk on the program, do not seem to strategies to ... Alas! Sure enough, as I expected in general, unfortunately, I guess.

 

寄件者: "White House Snapshot" [info@mail.whitehouse.gov]
寄件日期: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:17:06 +0800
收件者: [t_history@pchome.com.tw]
主旨: 4 facts about the President's Supreme Court nominee:

主旨：4點關於總統的最高法院提名：

白宮，華盛頓
 

快照
週四，2016年3月17日

 
 
 
 
  請跟隨：今天的日程安排

所有時間均為美國東部時間（ET）

10:00：總統和副總統接受了總統每日簡報

下午12:15：總統在首席法官加蘭德的確認過程中的一次電話會議參與

 
 
  精選

首席法官加蘭德梅里克：符合總統的提名

昨天，美國總統奧巴馬提名的首席法官梅里克加蘭最高法院。 “沒有人更有資格，現在服務於我們國家在這個關鍵角色，”總統寫道。了解更多關於為什麼美國總統奧巴馬選擇他的工作，並觀看此視頻，以滿足他自己：

司各脫

觀看視頻

 
 
  更多來自總統一家

4點關於提名

作為全國最好的上訴法官之一，首席法官加蘭德梅里克是最有資格的人立即出任最高法院。下面是你應該知道的首席法官加蘭德的背景和經歷的幾件事情：

    他有比歷史上任何最高法院提名更多的聯邦司法經驗。
    他帶領帶來俄克拉何馬城轟炸機蒂莫西·麥克維司法調查和起訴。
    他證實了特區巡迴法庭由美國參議院在76-23很強，兩黨投票。
    他曾輔導小學生在閱讀和數學近20年。

按照我們的有關提名和確認過程中更多的事實新的Twitter帳戶@SCOTUSnom。

SCOTUSNOM

自問自答：奧巴馬總統的2016年NCAA男籃錦標賽支架

綽號“巴拉克-etology，”填寫兩個男子和女子賽事支架已成為白宮一年一度的傳統。看看奧巴馬總統的2016年NCAA籃球錦標賽括號 - 一個年輕的信訪人的意見的啟發。

奧巴馬總統的2016年NCAA男籃錦標賽支架

查看更多

 
 
  報價的一天

“人們尊重梅里克的​​保護我們最基本的憲法權利深刻而持久的熱情。”
- 美國總統奧巴馬宣布他被提名為最高法院


 

˚FFacebook的Twitter的ŧ|更多的方式來吸引

難道有人轉發給你？註冊電子郵件更新

此電子郵件發送到t_history@pchome.com.tw~~V

退訂|隱私政策
請不要回复此郵件。聯繫白宮

白宮•建國路123號NW•華盛頓特區20500•202-456-1111

 

寄件者: "Josh Earnest, The White House" [info@mail.whitehouse.gov]
寄件日期: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:42:56 +0800
收件者: [t_history@pchome.com.tw]
主旨: What you need to know about the Supreme Court nominee:

主旨：你需要知道的關於最高法院提名人是什麼：

Yesterday, President Obama fulfilled his constitutional duty and nominated Chief Judge Merrick Garland to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court.

So who is Merrick Garland? And what happens now?

The reporters I talk to every day, and Americans across the country, are asking a lot of good questions about Judge Garland and the next steps in the Supreme Court nomination process.

Got a few of your own? Ask away today using #AskPressSec on Twitter and I’ll answer from @PressSec at 5:30pm ET.

In the meantime, here are a few answers to questions about the President’s nominee that we’ve been getting here at the White House.

Q: Who is Chief Judge Merrick Garland and why did President Obama choose him?

Check out

As Chief Judge of the most important federal appeals court in the nation, there is no question that Merrick Garland is eminently qualified to immediately serve on the Supreme Court. A meticulous jurist with a record of forging consensus among judges across the ideological spectrum, he was confirmed to sit on the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. in 1997 in a strong bipartisan vote of 76 to 23. Today, as Chief Judge of the D.C. Circuit, Judge Garland has more federal judicial experience than any Supreme Court nominee in history.

Born and raised in Illinois and a devoted family man, Judge Garland has dedicated his life to serving the American people, taking on some of the most difficult anti-terrorism cases in our nation's history. In the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing, he led the investigation and prosecution that ultimately brought Timothy McVeigh to justice. As a mentor to his law clerks and a tutor to elementary school children, he is a dedicated and compassionate public servant whom conservatives and progressives praise for his rigorous intellect, his respect for the role of the judiciary, and his mastery of the law.

And that's exactly why the President chose to nominate him.

Q: What happens after the President chooses a Supreme Court nominee?

The Constitution states that it is the President’s responsibility to nominate a person to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, a duty he fulfilled yesterday when he sent a letter notifying the Senate that he has selected Chief Judge Garland.

Now, according to the Constitution, it is the Senate’s job to advise and provide consent on the President’s nominee. That means that Senate Judiciary Committee members should hold a hearing to vet Chief Judge Garland, provide their recommendation, and then the full Senate should debate and vote on whether or not to confirm Judge Garland to the Senate. Every nominee since 1875 has received a hearing and a vote.

When it comes to the Supreme Court, this would be an unprecedented level of obstruction. Every nominee who was not withdrawn has received a vote within 125 days of nomination. The Senate has almost a full year to consider and confirm a nominee. In fact, since 1975, the average time from nomination to confirmation is 67 days. The longest time before confirmation in the past three decades was 99 days, for Justice Thomas, and the last four Justices, spanning two Administrations, were confirmed in an average of 75 days.

Throughout history, members of both parties in Congress and in the White House have done their jobs so that the Judicial Branch can do its own. See what President Obama said yesterday:

Q: Will the Senate ultimately confirm Chief Judge Garland?

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution clearly spells out how the confirmation process is supposed to work. The President took that constitutional responsibility seriously and consulted with both Democratic and Republican Senators before choosing a nominee. He even invited them to put forward potential nominees for his consideration. The result of his consultations and rigorous process is the decision to nominate a thoughtful and meticulous judge for the Supreme Court with a keen ability for building consensus. That's why even Republicans have described Chief Judge Garland as a consensus nominee.

In 1997, the U.S. Senate confirmed Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the D.C. Circuit Court in a bipartisan vote of 76 to 23.

The President fully expects Congress to honor their constitutional responsibility and allow this nominee a hearing and a vote. Despite repeated declarations that they will ignore such a responsibility, the President believes there will be enough Republicans listening to Americans and editorial boards across the country to honor their oath of office and do their jobs regardless of their party’s political leadership.

Q: Does it matter that this year is a presidential election year?

No. For more than two centuries, it has been standard practice for Congress to confirm a president’s Supreme Court nominee, whether in a presidential election year or not. In fact, six Justices have been confirmed in a presidential election year since 1900. Of those six Justices, three have been Republicans. The most recent Justice to be confirmed in an election year was Justice Kennedy -- appointed by President Reagan -- who was confirmed by a Democratic-controlled Congress in February 1988.

Q: Where can I get the latest on what’s happening with Judge Garland and the nomination process?

Check out www.whitehouse.gov/scotus and follow @SCOTUSnom on Twitter to all the latest info on what's happening with the President's Supreme Court nominee. This is an important process that is meant to stay above politics. So make sure you stay up to date on what's happening.

And don't forget, if you've got questions, join me on Twitter at 5:30 pm ET and use the hashtag #AskPressSec.

See you online!

Josh

Josh Earnest
White House Press Secretary
The White House
@PressSec

This email was sent to t_history@pchome.com.tw.
Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy
Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111

白宮，華盛頓

昨天，美國總統奧巴馬兌現了他的憲法職責，並任命首席法官梅里克花環以填補美國最高法院的空缺。

那麼，誰是梅里克花環？現在會發生什麼？

記者我跟每一天，而美國人在全國范圍內，都在問了很多關於法官加蘭德和最高法院提名過程的下一步驟好的問題。

有幾個你自己的？今天使用#AskPressSec問吧在Twitter上，我會從@PressSec下午5:30 ET回答。

在此期間，這裡是對總統提名的問題，我們已經在這裡獲得在白宮的幾個答案。

問：誰是首席法官梅里克花環和為什麼美國總統奧巴馬選擇他？

查看

符合梅里克花環，奧巴馬總統的最高法院提名

作為全國最重要的聯邦上訴法院首席法官，毫無疑問，梅里克花環絕對有資格立即送達最高法院。鍛造跨越意識形態的法官達成共識的記錄一絲不苟的法學家，他被證實在76〜23今天，強大的兩黨投票坐在上訴的DC，美國法院在1997年，作為直流電路的首席法官加蘭法官有比歷史上任何最高法院提名更多的聯邦司法經驗。

出生在伊利諾伊州和一個專門的家庭的人提出，加蘭法官一生致力於服務美國人民，採取了一些最困難的反恐案件在我們國家的歷史。在俄克拉何馬城爆炸案發生後，他帶領調查和起訴，最終帶來的蒂莫西·麥克維繩之以法。作為導師，他的法官助理和導師小學的孩子，他是一個敬業，富有同情心的公僕誰的保守派與革新稱讚他嚴謹的智慧，他對司法機構的作用方面，與他對法律的掌握。

而這也正是為什麼總統決定提名他。

問：總統選擇一個最高法院提名後會發生什麼？

憲法規定，這是總統的責任提名一人填補最高法院，他昨天應驗時，他發出了一封信，通知參議院，他選擇了加蘭首席法官的職責空缺。

符合梅里克花環，奧巴馬總統的最高法院提名

現在，根據憲法，這是參議院的工作提出建議，並提供有關總統提名同意。這意味著，參議院司法委員會成員應當舉行聽證會，獸醫首席法官加蘭德，提供他們的推薦，然後整個參議院應當討論以及是否要確認法官加蘭德參議院投票。自1875年以來每一個被提名人已收到聽證會和投票表決。

當涉及到最高法院，這將是阻礙了前所未有的水平。誰沒有撤回提名的每一個收到提名在125天投票。參議院幾乎整整一年，審議並確認提名。事實上，自1975年以來，從提名確認的平均時間為67天。在過去的三十年裡確認之前的時間最長為99天，托馬斯大法官，最後四位法官，跨越兩屆政府，是在平均75天的證實。

縱觀歷史，在國會和白宮兩黨成員做他們的工作，使司法部門可以做自己的。看看奧巴馬總統昨天說：

奧巴馬總統簽署的正式信件提名首席法官梅里克加蘭最高法院

問：美國參議院最終確認首席法官加蘭德？

第二條，憲法第2條明確規定了確認過程是如何工作的。總統說了憲法責任認真選擇提名人之前既民主黨和共和黨參議員磋商。他甚至邀請他們提出提名人選為他考慮。他的磋商和嚴格的過程的結果是提名最高法院周到細緻的判斷與建立共識的敏銳能力的決定。這就是為什麼即使共和黨人描述首席法官加蘭德的共識候選人。

1997年，美國參議院確認首席法官加蘭德梅里克向哥倫比亞特區巡迴法院的76兩黨投票23。

總統充分預計國會履行其憲法責任，並允許該被提名人舉行聽證會和投票表決。儘管一再聲明，他們會忽視這樣的責任，總統認為有足夠的共和黨聽美國人和編輯委員會在全國范圍內履行其宣誓就職，並做他們的工作，無論他們的黨的政治領導。

問：它的問題，今年是總統選舉年？

不可以。兩個多世紀以來，它一直是標準做法國會確認總統的最高法院提名，無論是在總統選舉年還是不行。事實上，六法官已在總統選舉年自1900年以來這六個法官證實，三名已經共和黨人。最近大法官在選舉年確認是肯尼迪大法官 - 誰是在1988年2月證實了民主黨控制的國會 - 裡根總統任命。

問：我在哪裡可以得到什麼與法官加蘭德和提名過程發生的最新消息？
退房www.whitehouse.gov/scotus並按照@SCOTUSnom在Twitter上對所有的東西與總統的最高法院提名發生的最新信息。這是為了保持政治之上的一個重要過程。因此，請確保你了解最新的發生了什麼。

而且不要忘了，如果你有疑問，請加入我的Twitter下午5:​​30 ET，並使用＃標籤#AskPressSec。

見你在線！

喬希

喬希認真
白宮新聞秘書
白宮
@PressSec
訪問WhiteHouse.gov

此電子郵件發送到t_history@pchome.com.tw。
退訂|隱私政策
請不要回复此郵件。聯繫白宮

白宮•1600賓夕法尼亞大道NW•華盛頓特區20500•202-456-1111