|
Https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClMUwq9hR8wSBZF_rtzvSHw/videos
Who is the Mole of the Voice of America event?
- Gu Xiaojunist:"First Impartiality emperor" talk • 3324
Voice of the United States interrupted Guo Wengui interview incident, has been on the network uproar.
Former New Zealand reporter Zhao Yan said: "Mr. Dong hard, and many people know the truth after you and Gong Xiaoxia apology, once again on your iron shoulder that noble salute, your interview is historic.
User Yang Jian Ao said: "Hello everyone, I just signed a petition on the White House website, asked the Government to investigate the incident yesterday, the United States."
"The news of the New York Times and the statement of the Voice of America do not seem to lift everyone's doubts, and it is only possible to truthfully announce the truth before it sorts the biggest wounds in the history of the Voice of America. Voice of America has the chance of rebirth. "
And the official observation studio Zhaoming said: "The FBI can intervene in the investigation of VOA who is the hidden mole."
So, who is the voice of the Mole? Voice of America Interview Guo Wengui Interview incident, there is no mole it?
I thought: yes Otherwise, I made the same time, made only one night two video "hot: Guo Wen Gui and the Voice of America" and "Voice of the United States politely declined Guo Wengui" why the former watch 388 times, while the latter is 549 times? And the latter "Voice of the United States politely declined Guo Wengui", from the point of view of these words, is already misleading readers.
Visible, the reader is to see is that I have just encountered "Gu's fans 8.30 political injustice case" after the "politely declined event" and He Qinglian.
Therefore, I would like to use the Voice of America to deal with "Overthrow Lu Xun" and He Qinglian attitude to prove that the voice of the United States Mole.
"Overthrow Lu Xun", is well known that I launched on September 16, 2007 to screen the history and the characters, "Lu Xun" the truth of the activities. At first, the official support of the mainland, has been TOM network, the new network interview, by the People's Network, China Network expert blog as a key to put on the headlines; primary and secondary school textbooks, according to each semester to reduce the speed of several in progress. , The newspaper, January 22, 2008, "People's Daily" named criticism, the national newspapers, magazines, radio, television follow-up, Wanqi Qi Hong; up to the network more than ten thousand articles criticized my article (see Video "" Overthrow Lu Xun "in the" down Gu Xiaojun "absurd").
And I "Overthrow Lu Xun" reason, mainly: 1, Lu Xun is not a "revolutionist", "thinker", or even can not be called "writer" (see video "to defeat what kind of Lu Xun"). 2, Lu Xun is the false type of Mao Zedong tree (see the video "how Lu Xun becomes God"). 3, "Lu Xun is the channel between Yan'an and Japan" (see "Overthrow Lu Xun" in this book related articles).
Such a Lu Xun, should not be down? If that should not be down, that is, along the Mao Zedong shape of the false, continue to hold a fake people. Is not that so?
This time, I do the above mentioned three screens, I know: Voice of America, in 2015, to "focus dialogue", released nearly 26 minutes of video "works" gradually "middle school textbooks, Lu Xun is out of date? " In 2015, eight years after "Overthrow Lu Xun", it was planned to publish the book "Overthrow Lu Xun" in Taiwan. And some people also organized well-known critic Cao Changqing's "Lu Xun Do not fall the giant "and Yang Hengjun" Lu Xun and Hu Shi, indispensable "article, attack on me.
I do not know, the Voice of America "focus dialogue" nearly 26 minutes of video, is not combined with Cao Changqing and Yang Hengjun combination, three-dimensional combination.
And He Qinglian, read the "Voice of the United States politely declined Guo Wengui" video, all know: User Redemption Report: Since 2013, overseas media blocked you, because He Qing Lian.
User salvation report, not without reason. 2015, the United States friends Xie Xue, exposed, criticized He Qinglian, and He Qinglian but angry with me; results, resulting in the occurrence of network events - He Qing rippling Gu Xiaojun. Commonly known as "He Qinglian and Gu Xiaojun tear war". In fact, I have never scolded He Qing Lian, we can check.
And Xie Xue exposed, criticized He Qinglian, and the salvation report He Qinglian, also with the Voice of America, they think: 1, He Qinglian's article superficial, why the Voice of the United States He Qing Lian (I also agree with their point of view, I thought: at least I Recently contacted Liu Gang, He Qiao, Zhao Yan level, are in He Qinglian above). 2, He Qinglian a lot of articles, are around the bend for the mainland to speak, why the voice of the United States continue to special pet He Qinglian (I also agree with their point of view, we can see China's free spring forum "Xie Xue blog" in the article). 3, He Qinglian some of the views of the article, suspected of copying others (see "Xie Xue blog" in the article and the redemption of my blog in China's article thread).
From above, the attitude of "Overthrow Lu Xun" and He Qinglian, I thought: has proved - the voice of the United States, there are Mole.
Thank you for watching!
Gu Xiaojun 2017-4-21 Nanjing，China
Translator: God Has eyes
谁是美国之音事件之鼹鼠？
——顾晓军主义：“先帝”曰•三千三百二十四
美国之音中断郭文贵专访事件，已在网络上闹得沸沸扬扬。
前纽时记者赵岩说：“东方先生辛苦了，很多人知道真相后都在给您和龚小夏道歉，再次对你们的铁肩表示崇高的敬礼，你们的采访是历史性的。”
网友杨健翱说：“大家好，我刚在白宫网站上填了一份请愿书，要求政府彻查昨天美国之音事件”。
明镜的何頻也说：“纽约时报的报导与美国之音的声明，似乎都未能解除大家的疑虑。唯有诚实地公佈真相，才可能缝合这个美国之音歷史上最大的伤口。我希望美国之音有重生的机会”。
而官场观察工作室昭明说：“美国联邦调查局可以介入，调查美国之音内部谁是隐藏的鼹鼠”。
那么，谁是美国之音事件之鼹鼠？美国之音中断郭文贵专访事件，有没有鼹鼠呢？
我以为：是有的。否则，我的同时发的、仅发了一晚的两视频《热点：郭文贵与美国之音》与《美国之音婉拒了郭文贵》，为何前者观看388次、而后者是549次呢？且，后者“美国之音婉拒了郭文贵”，从这几个字的层面上看，是已经误导了读者。
可见，读者要看的是其中、我刚遭遇“顾粉团8.30政治大冤案”后的“婉拒事件”及何清涟。
因此，我想用美国之音对待“打倒鲁迅”及何清涟的态度，证明美国之音中有鼹鼠。
“打倒鲁迅”，是众所周知的、我2007年9月16日发起的甄别历史及人物、“鲁迅”之真相的活动。起初，得到了大陆官方的支持，曾被TOM网、中新网专访，被人民网、中国网专家博客等作为重点推上头条；中小学教科书，也按每学期减少好几篇的速度在进行。后，被2008年1月22日的《人民日报》点名批判，全国的报刊、杂志、电台、电视跟进，万炮齐轰；最多时，网络上有一万多篇批判我的文章（参见视频《“打倒鲁迅”中的“打倒顾晓军”的荒唐》）。
而我“打倒鲁迅”的理由，主要是：一、鲁迅不是什么“革命家”、“思想家”，甚至不能称之为“文学家”（参见视频《要打倒什么样的鲁迅》）。二、鲁迅是毛泽东树的假典型（参见视频《鲁迅是怎样变成神的》）。三、《鲁迅是延安与日本之间的通道》（参见《打倒鲁迅》这本书中的相关文章）。
这样的鲁迅，该不该打倒呢？若说不该打倒，那就是沿着毛泽东塑造的假典型、在继续捧一个假人物。难道不是这样吗？
这次，我做以上提到的三个视屏，才知道：美国之音，在2015年，以“焦点对话”、发布了近26分钟的视频《作品“渐退”中学教材，鲁迅是否过时？》。而2015年，正是我在“打倒鲁迅”的八年后、筹划在台湾出版这本《打倒鲁迅》的书的时间段；且，有人还组织了著名评论家曹长青的《鲁迅是打不倒的巨人》和杨恒均的《鲁迅与胡适，缺一不可》的文章，对我狙击。
我不知，美国之音的“焦点对话”的近26分钟的视频，是不是与曹长青和杨恒均之组合的再组合、立体组合。
而何清涟，看了《美国之音婉拒了郭文贵》视频的、都知道：网友救赎举报：自2013年始，海外媒体封杀你，是因为何清涟。
网友救赎的举报，不是没有道理。2015年，美国网友谢雪，揭露、批判何清涟，而何清涟却迁怒与我；结果，导致发生网络事件——何清涟辱骂顾晓军。俗称“何清涟与顾晓军的撕逼大战”。而事实上，我从未回骂过何清涟，大家可查。
而谢雪揭露、批判何清涟，与救赎举报何清涟，也与美国之音有关，他们认为：一、何清涟的文章肤浅，美国之音为何专宠何清涟（我也同意他们的观点，我以为：至少我最近接触的刘刚、何频、赵岩的水平，都在何清涟之上）。二、何清涟的不少文章，都是在绕着弯子替大陆说话，美国之音为何继续专宠何清涟（我也同意他们的观点，大家可看中国自由之春论坛的“谢雪博客”里的文章）。三、何清涟的有的文章里的观点，涉嫌抄袭他人（见“谢雪博客”里的文章与救赎在我博客中国里的文章的跟帖）。
从以上、对“打倒鲁迅”及何清涟的态度，我以为：已经证明了——美国之音中，确有鼹鼠。
谢谢大家观看！
顾晓军 2017-4-21 南京
|
