桃園年菜外賣>
麻辣火鍋 觀音
2015年01月31日 16:16
記者林奕如／綜合報導
周杰倫好友雪糕23日在微博開炮「小豬」羅志祥拿昆凌假情書炒作，當時引起一陣軒然大波，事後他在簽唱會上解釋是一情緒激動，但沒有開口道歉。事情經過7天後，他態度大轉變，30日在微博寫下約300字道歉文，並稱小豬是有智慧的華人巨星，希望這件事到此告一段落。
▲▼小豬曾對昆凌寫給他的情書做出回應（上圖）。此舉引發周杰倫好友雪糕不滿，當時在微博發文嗆聲。（下圖）。（圖／資料照／羅
高雄 火鍋吃到飽志祥、昆凌臉書、雪糕微博）
雪糕30日在微博PO文表示，因為自己的言論給某些人帶來不好的感覺，那就是代表不夠有智慧，沒有顧慮到每一個人，認為公眾人物得學會謹言慎行，惜名惜福。此外，他也稱讚小豬是華人巨星，對這次發言引起的紛爭道歉，「我希望和這兩位及因這次發言影響到他們身邊的人產生不愉快的感受都說聲抱歉，I am sorry，希望所有的不美好到此為止。」
▲雪糕30日在微博發文道歉全文。（圖／翻攝自雪糕微博
台北濱江年菜2017）
事實上，當初是因為昆凌在黑澀會美眉影片被挖出寫給小豬情書，小豬曾對此做出回應，當時被雪糕在微博痛批「這樣的舉動恰當嗎？」引起兩派粉絲激烈罵戰。事後，雪糕在簽唱會上表示怒嗆原因是因為心疼、想保護女方「她為周董犧牲很多」，好友周董則在微博力挺「兄弟們，在這紛擾的網絡世界，為我發聲或為我抱不平，都只會讓人誤解」，而小豬則是在微博PO文「隨風而去」停止恩怨。
2017-01-0503:00
CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University （NTU） president Yang Pan-chyr （楊泮池） was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te （林達德）, who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua （許文華） said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan （閔明源） and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen （張上淳）.“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang （郭明良） — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo （黃光國） accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh （嚴孟祿）, a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million （US$208,617） Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council （now Ministry of Science and
燒烤推薦 泰山 Technology） official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun （劉源俊）, president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the university reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray （張慶瑞） and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
陽明山美軍宿舍群所有權人台灣銀行釋出房舍招租，吸引業者進駐開店，形成新商圈，帶來人潮，但因有業者把紅磚外牆漆成鮮紅色，用柵欄取代灌木叢圍牆，引來文資團體質疑台銀和北市文化局疏於把關，讓文化景觀陽明山美軍宿舍頓失歷史價值。寬廣庭園旁一棟棟古樸磚造的低矮房舍，經典美式建築，讓人來到這裡，就像走回50年代的美國，陽明山美軍宿舍，占地42000坪，共115棟，因保有防空洞、停機坪等全國保存最好的冷戰軍事地景，2008年登錄為文化景觀，土地所有權人台銀，為了活化這邊的資產，和北市文化局申請，開發招商。飄著小雨，還是有人特地上山，就為了喝一杯咖啡，業者看好軍事基地的獨特氛圍，選擇到這裡開業，但看看原本的磚造外牆，竟被塗上了鮮豔紅色，應該是灌木圍籬，也被換上一個個柵欄，原始的宿舍樣貌，完全變了樣。而這軍事基地爭議還不只這一樁，文資團體出來痛批，他們承租了一間宿舍要做歷史推廣，沒有營利但每月要付高達60000租金，後面還有高達70幾萬的地價稅，實在無力負荷，只能在2月退場，痛批政府，只顧賺錢的業者。陽明山古蹟聯盟執行長王文才：「這個地價稅，讓我們沒有辦法負擔，原來的租金對我們就很吃力，加上這個地價稅，就逼迫我們必須退場。」50年代就保留到現在的軍事宿舍，因為招商蒙上破護文化資產的罵名，讓長期在開發和文化間為難的北市府，再度頭大。台北市長柯文哲：「他的財產是台灣銀行的，那台北市政府指定說，你這個是古蹟，可是我們就掰掰，就變成說古蹟的保存，變成台銀要負責，那如果是有社會責任的企業，也許他願意花點錢去弄，有的根本是擺爛。」市長言下之意，難道是想台北市收回來管嗎？目前台銀針對爭議，也尚未說明，只強調承租給業者一切都合法，堪稱全台最大的軍事宿舍保留地，當初定調結合文創和在地歷史，卻憑添風坡。（民視新聞林姍亭、周晨暉台北報導）
1BB7F4D06DDBE9EC
文章定位：
