Today, there is certainly not anything wrong with this, I just believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on potential traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes will only gain their site rankings in a...
I run a report service on my site, and I'm seeing a growing number of articles being submitted, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is most likely because of the increasing quantity of PLR articles and material that's becoming available.
Now, there is not necessarily something wrong with this, I only believe that writers who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or customers. Such source boxes is only going to benefit their site rankings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine. In case people choose to discover further on linklicious.me affiliate, there are lots of libraries you might consider pursuing.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they're losing out can be as follows.
Much of the traffic to my report listing comes from search engines, by people looking for info on a particular topic. Now, this user types within their keywords, clicks on the search box, and is given a list of relevant sites. They selected one, and are taken to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's reference field at the conclusion of-the article to see what else they've to say on this subject. Clicking alternative to linklicious likely provides aids you should give to your co-worker. There, they look for a link to some site marketing portable ringtones. May be the audience going to be impressed, or interested in this? Not very likely. They wish to learn about snowboarding, not personalize their phone. I believe among three things will happen then:
The audience leaves the whole site in disgust.
The reader clicks on a link to your relevant report. To study more, you can check out: linklicious.me alternatives.
The reader clicks on a related Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual marketing) offer.
They do not click the author's reference link. That's a potential consumer lost, quite probably for good.
Yes, put a link in to your site in the source package, but most article sites allow several links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s related to the article subject also, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the consumer.
'But my site doesn't have anything to do with that subject about it'!
Adding something that does. Include a report listing, and have the source package saying 'To see more articles on this issue, just click here.' Add a web service, and have the text say 'To look at links to sites with this subject, click here.' Or simply head to ClickBank, try to find related projects, and have a link to them, using the link saying something similar to 'If you prefer to find out more on this issue, obtain this item.' Ultimately, not a direct link to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one.
Using this method, you still get that connect to your website that you were after actually, but, furthermore, you have the opportunity to earn money from the reader in a new way. A situation. Plus, you do not appear to be someone simply posting purchased information on any matter just for the sake of the backlink it'll give you. To get other viewpoints, please consider checking out: linklicious tutorial. A much more professional look. Isn't it worth taking the time to make greater use of the resource box?.
文章定位：
