Now, there is certainly not anything wrong with this, I just think that authors who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or clients. Such source boxes will simply benefit their site rankings in a...
I run a report service on my site, and I am seeing an increasing amount of articles being submitted, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. My brother discovered linklicious service by browsing Google Books. This is most likely due to the increasing quantity of PLR articles and material that's becoming available.
Now, there is not necessarily anything wrong with this, I only believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on possible traffic and/or consumers. Such source boxes will simply benefit their site ranks in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out is as follows.
Much of the traffic to my article listing comes from search engines, by people trying to find information on a particular subject. Today, this user types in their key words, presses on the search box, and is given a summary of related sites. They selected one, and are taken up to the author's article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, believe 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource box at the end of the article to see what else they have to say on this issue. There, they find a link to some site promotion portable ringers. If you are interested in literature, you will likely fancy to explore about linklicious vs lindexed. Is the audience going to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. They want to find out about snowboarding, not personalize their phone. I really believe one of three things will happen then:
The reader leaves the whole site in disgust.
The reader clicks on the link to some relevant report. I discovered service like linklicious by browsing webpages.
The viewer clicks on the relevant Google AdSense (or similar contextual advertising) ad.
They do not click the author's reference link. That's a possible client dropped, very probably permanently.
Yes, put a link in to your site in the reference package, but most article directories let several links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s associated with the article subject also, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the consumer.
'But my site does not have any such thing regarding that matter on it'!
Then add a thing that does. Include a report directory, and have the reference box saying 'To learn more articles on this subject, click here.' Add a web directory, and have the written text say 'To view links to websites on this issue, just click here.' Or just go to ClickBank, look for related jobs, and have a link to them, together with the link saying something such as 'If you prefer to learn more on this issue, obtain this product.' Preferably, not a direct connect to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one.
Using this method, you still get that connect to your website that you were after formerly, but, also, you've the opportunity to generate income from the audience in a fresh way. A situation. We learned about check out sick submitter linklicious by searching the Internet. Plus, you don't look like somebody simply publishing acquired information on any matter just for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. A much more professional look. Isn't it worth making the effort to make greater use of the resource package?.
文章定位：
