Student: Mmmm. Dunno, all-that pollution and stuff is pretty bad.
Professor: You think the is the source on most pollution then?
Student: Obviously. To check up more, please check-out: website.
Professor: You've done re-search into this?
Student: Hummph. You should not, everybody knows that's true.
Professor: Actually? My research tells me differently. Tell me, what do you mean when you say pollution?
Student: Smells, poisoned...
Professor: So...You have an interest in learning Chemical Engineering?
Student: Mmmm. Dunno, all-that pollution and stuff is pretty bad.
Professor: You believe the industry is the source of all pollution then?
Student: Clearly.
Professor: You have done research in-to this?
Student: Hummph. No need to, everyone knows that is true.
Professor: Actually? My research tells me differently. Tell me, what do you mean when you say pollution?
Student: Smells, poisoned revenues and people dying.
Professor: And you think this all comes down to-the chemical industry?
Student: Yes. If you have an opinion about jewelry, you will probably require to compare about purchase here.
Professor: What about each of the gases that come from your boiler at home? Think about the gases which come out of your car? How about all the gases which come out of the power-station to produce the electricity for the lights or air-conditioning at home? What about...
Student: Yeah, yeah, whatever.
Professor: You insult me by finding an argument, and then refusing to hear an opposing view. I really do not need you o-n my course anyway, go along and allow the next person in please.
Student: What do you mean, you dont want me? Huh?
Professor: Exactly that, go along now.
Student: OK, persuade me that the people running those chemical plants are good folks who produce no air pollution
Professor: That has been not what I said. They do make pollution, but much less of it than they applied to and much less than any power-station does. There are controls on what gases they can launch into the air, and how much of every gas. The firms must check their emissions and tell the federal government whenever they generate too much.
Student: Very possible. If you are concerned with scandal, you will perhaps need to study about glyconutrients.
Professor: The federal government deliver personnel around to check on the tracking is set up. Unannounced visits are made by these officials and there had better be a good description should they find any missing data.
Student: Mmmm
Professor: The firms are established five-year goals to reduce their emissions below current levels. The government sets them another reduction target that's to be reached within another five years, when they hit those targets, even when they hit them after two years
Student: Thats not so good.
Professor: It seems unfair at times, however the continuous drive for paid down emissions makes the business spend money on research and new processes to decrease the amount of waste gases it releases. I-t encourages the company to get uses for all those waste gases.
Student: That seems decent.
Professor: Technology is moving on constantly. Processes be more productive and pollution is reduced. No industry could ever reduce its pollution to zero, though.
Student: Why not?
Professor: Its a law of diminishing returns. We found out about like by browsing Google. 90-mile of the emissions may be removed at low cost. That leaves 10%. A further 9-11 may be removed at high-cost, however making 1%. An exceptionally high cost is needed to eliminate the next 0.9%, but there is still 0.1% of the original amount. You can view that the removal cost is increasing, however the pollution reduction is becoming more and more marginal.
Student: Right. So is chemical engineering the ideal choice then?
Professor: I-t depends... You have to be good at solving problems, in order to think laterally. You have to be able to act as a part of a group, also.
Student: Right...
Professor: You also need to be involved in-a career in management
Student: Huh, whys that?
Professor: Technology moves along rapidly in this field and within a decade of gaining your degree your understanding is likely to be out-dated. There will be new students competing for the jobs you'll have been doing, who have current knowledge. Many chemical engineers move into management after about a dozen years in the task. Their background of engineering is still useful, but they observe that they're no longer at the innovative.
Student: But management could be a good career to, cant it?
Professor: It may, indeed. Are you interested in finding out more then?
Student: Absolutely, and thanks..
文章定位：
